Efficient Structural Optimization of Space Trusses Using Artificial Neural Network-Based Surrogate Models

Authors

https://doi.org/10.48314/ijrceai.v2i4.60

Abstract

The Artificial Neural Network (ANN) has emerged as an essential element in the modern structural optimization due to its outstanding ability to approximate nonlinear structural behavior and drastically reduce computation cost involved in numerous finite element analyses. The traditional optimization algorithm for truss structures usually involves thousands of structural analyses in the process of searching solutions, which implies substantial computation cost and limited application to large-size engineering optimization tasks. Recent research results in machine learning, surrogate modeling, and data-driven optimization show the possibility of replacing numerically expensive structural analyses with neural network-based model without loss of the solution accuracy. The work studies the utilization of Backpropagation Neural Network (BPNN) and Counterpropagation Neural Network (CPNN) models as surrogate structural analyzers for the weight optimization of truss structures. The two types of neural networks are trained on the dataset of structural responses obtained in the process of finite element analysis and incorporated into the optimization process. The performance of BPNN and CPNN models is analyzed according to computation efficiency, convergence properties, and approximation accuracy on a benchmark 52-member space truss. Moreover, the review of modern developments in machine learning-assisted structural optimization is presented. Both of the neural network architectures have shown considerable improvements in computation times while sustaining adequate accuracy of predictions. While the CPNN shows greater speed of convergence, BPNN shows better accuracy of structural responses predictions during the optimization process. This approach proves that application of ANN models for surrogate modeling can be considered as an effective and robust method of solving challenging structural optimization problems. 

Keywords:

Artificial neural networks, Structural optimization, Truss structures, Backpropagation neural network, Counterpropagation neural network, Surrogate modeling, Machine learning

References

  1. [1] Haykin, S. S. (2009). Neural networks and learning machines. Pearson. https://books.google.com/books?id=KCwWOAAACAAJ
  2. [2] Rao, S. S. (2019). Engineering optimization: Theory and practice. John Wiley & Sons. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781119454816
  3. [3] Simpson, T. W., Poplinski, J. D., Koch, P. N., & Allen, J. K. (2001). Metamodels for computer-based engineering design: Survey and recommendations. Engineering with computers, 17(2), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00007198
  4. [4] Yu, Y., Hur, T., Jung, J., & Jang, I. G. (2019). Deep learning for determining a near-optimal topological design without any iteration. Structural and multidisciplinary optimization, 59(3), 787–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-2101-5
  5. [5] Banga, S., Gehani, H., Bhilare, S., Patel, S., & Kara, L. (2021). 3D topology optimization using convolutional neural networks. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1808.07440
  6. [6] Wang, J., Chen, K., Yang, H., & Zhang, L. (2024). Ensemble deep learning enabled multi-condition generative design of aerial building machine considering uncertainties. Automation in construction, 157, 105134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.105134
  7. [7] Faroughi, S. A., Pawar, N. M., Fernandes, C., Raissi, M., Das, S., Kalantari, N. K., & Kourosh Mahjour, S. (2024). Physics-guided, physics-informed, and physics-encoded neural networks and operators in scientific computing: Fluid and solid mechanics. Journal of computing and information science in engineering, 24(4), 40802. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4064449
  8. [8] Kaveh, A., & Mahdavi, V. R. (2014). Colliding bodies optimization: A novel meta-heuristic method. Computers & structures, 139, 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.04.005
  9. [9] Sahin, T., Wolff, D., von Danwitz, M., & Popp, A. (2024). Towards a hybrid digital twin: physics-informed neural networks as surrogate model of a reinforced concrete beam. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.08406
  10. [10] Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning. MIT Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=-s2MEAAAQBAJ
  11. [11] Adeli, H., & Park, H. S. (1995). A neural dynamics model for structural optimization—Theory. Computers & structures, 57(3), 383–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(95)00048-L
  12. [12] Sunil, P., & Sills, R. B. (2026). FE-PINNs: Finite-element-based physics-informed neural networks for surrogate modeling. APL machine learning, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0299671
  13. [13] Đorđević, F., & Marinković, M. (2025). PINN surrogate model for nonlinear equilibrium path analysis of von Mises shallow truss. Journal of big data, 12(1), 103. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-025-01095-9
  14. [14] Zhang, C., & Yu, J. (2025). Fem-constrained neural network-based surrogate model (FCNN-SM) for rapid structural response prediction: Algorithm framework and reliability analysis applications. International journal of solids and structures, 321, 113556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2025.113556
  15. [15] Martinez, Y., Rojas, L., Peña, A., Valenzuela, M., & Garcia, J. (2025). Physics-informed neural networks for the structural analysis and monitoring of railway bridges: A systematic review. Mathematics, 13(10), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13101571
  16. [16] Yarmohammadian, R., Put, F., & Van Coile, R. (2025). Physics-informed surrogate modelling in fire safety engineering: A systematic review. Applied sciences, 15(15), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15158740
  17. [17] Baniya, S., & Maity, D. (2025). A comprehensive review of theoretical concepts and advancements in physics-informed neural networks with applications in structural engineering. Artificial intelligence review, 59(2), 49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-025-11444-y
  18. [18] Deb, K., & Sundar, J. (2006). Reference point based multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on genetic and evolutionary computation (pp. 635–642). New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1143997.1144112
  19. [19] Sahin, T., Wolff, D., von Danwitz, M., & Popp, A. (2024). Towards a hybrid digital twin: fusing sensor information and physics in surrogate modeling of a reinforced concrete beam. 2024 sensor data fusion: Trends, solutions, applications (SDF) (pp. 1–8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SDF63218.2024.10773885
  20. [20] López-González, N., Rodríguez, E., & Greiner, D. (2025). A multi-objective evolutionary computation approach for improving neural network-based surrogate models in structural engineering. Algorithms, 18(12), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/a18120754
  21. [21] Vanderplaats, G. N. (1988). Multidiscipline design optimization. Applied mechanics reviews, 41(6), 257–262. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3151897

Downloads

Published

2025-12-15

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): International Journal of Researches on Civil Engineering with Artificial Intelligence (IJRCEAI)

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Gholizadeh Eratbeni, M. (2025). Efficient Structural Optimization of Space Trusses Using Artificial Neural Network-Based Surrogate Models. International Journal of Researches on Civil Engineering With Artificial Intelligence , 2(4), 192-201. https://doi.org/10.48314/ijrceai.v2i4.60

Similar Articles

11-20 of 25

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.